The player might depart Manchester United on a loan deal that includes a purchase option, with initial talks already underway to facilitate his move away from Old Trafford.

Rasmus Højlund has faced a tough second season at Manchester United, managing just eight goals and four assists in 42 appearances, including five goals in the Europa League group stage. He’s only netted three times in the Premier League, with just one goal in 2025 against Leicester City. His long-term future at Old Trafford is now uncertain.

According to Tuttosport, Juventus are exploring the idea of bringing the former Atalanta striker back to Serie A this summer. The Italian club has reportedly made early contact with his representatives, viewing the potential transfer as a “low-cost” opportunity. They are considering a paid loan deal that includes a purchase option, though no official offer has been made yet.

With Manchester United expected to bolster their attacking options, they may be open to letting either Højlund or Joshua Zirkzee leave. The club reportedly leans toward parting with Højlund due to the possibility of securing a better deal.

Juventus sees the prospect of signing Højlund, especially ahead of the FIFA Club World Cup, as quite attractive. More concrete developments could emerge if the club decides to seriously pursue the Danish international.

Rasmus Højlund’s situation at Manchester United is becoming increasingly precarious, and the Juventus interest adds a compelling twist to his future. His underwhelming second season—just 3 Premier League goals and a quiet 2025 overall—has understandably raised questions within the club about his long-term role, especially with United aggressively targeting more clinical forwards this summer.

Juventus viewing him as a “low-cost” opportunity via a loan with an option to buy is smart business on their part. It would give Højlund a chance to revive his form in a familiar league (where he impressed with Atalanta), while allowing United to potentially offload him without a major financial hit if he doesn’t bounce back.

The fact that United might prefer to part with Højlund over Zirkzee—especially if Zirkzee hits the ground running—suggests they’re already rethinking their attacking blueprint. And with the Club World Cup on the horizon, Juve clearly sees value in adding a young, physically dominant striker like Højlund to their squad depth.

If he does leave, do you think United should hold out for a permanent deal now, or is a loan with a strong purchase clause the smarter route to preserve his value?